Those who receive the endowment covenant never to disclose certain portions
of the ceremony --specifically, the signs, tokens, and keywords of the
holy priesthood. Because of this injunction to silence about some portions
of the ceremony, Latter-day Saints are typically reticent to discuss any
aspect of the ceremony. Exposés of the endowment, which some anti-Mormon
evangelicals are fond of publicizing, violate LDS sensibilities of the
sacred.
As an endowed Latter-day Saint, I am concerned that my people's desire
to preserve the sanctity of temple worship has turned into paranoia. Our
covenants permit us to say in public much, much more about the ceremony
than we are wont to do; and though we insist that the endowment is "sacred"
not "secret," in practice we proceed as if these terms were
synonymous.
In an article on the connection between Mormonism and Masonry which appeared
in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Michael Homer observes
that the Saints' reluctance to release an official text of the endowment
gives "more credibility to unauthorized exposés than would
otherwise be the case."
I sense that this reluctance is due ultimately to a kind of embarrassment
about the endowment--a fear that the ceremony will seem "weird"
to outsiders (as, indeed, it seems "weird" to many Latter-day
Saints the first time through) or that detractors will hold the ceremony
up to ridicule.
I do not share these concerns. Since detractors have already put the
ceremony on public display, silence on our part merely allows others to
control how the public perceives us. And the "weirdness"--that
is to say, the distinctiveness--of the ceremony is, in my opinion, one
of its chief attractions. I see the endowment as a witness to the creative,
spiritual power present in my faith tradition. I therefore have no qualms
about discussing the endowment with people who want to know what goes
on inside the temple . . . with the proviso that I will not disclose what
I have specifically covenanted not to disclose. To do that would violate
my sense of the endowment's significance as an initiation into sacred
knowledge.
On this website, you will find various descriptions or texts of the endowment.
In reproducing these, I have omitted those few elements of the ceremony
that are meant to be disclosed only to initiates: that is, I have omitted
specific descriptions of the signs, tokens, and keywords, as well as (in
pre-1990 texts) the penalties.
For readability's sake, I have tried to make the omissions relatively
unobtrusive. My goal has been to create a website that allows researchers
to study the endowment and its historical development in detail, while
respecting the sanctity of the ritual experience--leaving unspoken what
is meant to be left unspoken.
- Along these lines, LDS sociologist Armand Mauss has written:
[T]here is no real reason that even devout Church members
could not talk more about the temple ceremonies than they do, with
appropriate discretion about time and place, since the oaths of secrecy
attach only to the new names, signs, tokens, and penalties. Indeed,
more open talk about the temple would not only facilitate understanding
among both Mormons and non-Mormons in certain historical and scholarly
respects, but would also infinitely improve the preparedness of initiates,
almost all of whom now enter the temple with only the vaguest idea
of what to expect or of the obligations they will be asked to assume.
Mauss also writes, "Nor is anyone likely to be mollified by the facile
'explanation' so often heard that the temple ceremonies are 'sacred,
not secret,' a semantic word play ignoring the fact that to Mormons
the ceremonies are obviously both." See Armand L. Mauss, "Culture,
Charisma, and Change: Reflections on Mormon Temple Worship," Dialogue:
A Journal of Mormon Thought 20.4 (Winter 1987): 77-78.
- Michael W. Homer, "'Similarity of Priesthood in Masonry': The Relationship
between Freemasonry and Mormonism," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon
Thought 27.3 (Fall 1994): 42.
- Strictly speaking, I am not under an obligation not to disclose the
penalties, since I received the endowment after the 1990 revision (when
the penalties and all references to them were removed from the ceremony).
However, since the penalties were historically protected by covenants
of non-disclosure, I have omitted them from the texts that appear here.
Back to Top | Webmaster
|